GRAHAM, NOV 24
“I think costs may be upper quartile in the comms market and it may be worth revisiting costs and packages.”
1 Reply:
Restaurants. Hotels. Movies. Accountants. Reviews and recommendations help you make the best decisions. So, check out ours below and find out more about the difference our work has made. Right now we’re rocking at 4.5 out of 5 (90% in accountancy speak) from just shy of 1500 reviews.
Reviews 1847
4.56
5 *
1146
4 *
594
3 *
89
2 *
12
1 *
1
“I think costs may be upper quartile in the comms market and it may be worth revisiting costs and packages.”
“Regular communication as to progress and issues as they arose. Well planned and timetable met. Reasonable cost of services.”
“Output concise and practical. Sometimes takes a little longer than wanted. How can you get stuff like KYC slicker? That would make a difference.”
“I’ve loved working with Fern and Steph over the past 3 years – they are really a super team! They are always on hand should we have a question and very helpful in their answers. The Scheme Accounts are always signed before the deadline dates and any issues are always raised, so the team can sort out. I recommend CP to every client I have and any others going through a tender for an Auditor (I should be paid commission in all honesty 😉 )”
“The team have done a great job. Richard seemed to pick everything up with ease and was great to work with. Had a teams call with Sky who as usual is very helpful and personable. Great job, nothing negative to report”
“Overall excellent service again from both the Audit and Tax teams. Great people, excellent relationships built and a pleasure to work with. Really like the consistency of staff and managing teams with staff progressing to senior members of the team to ensure the continuity. My only negative comment and what to watch out for going forward is your pressure to keep increasing fees.”
“Knowledge of the matters discussed seems to be broad and concise need to develop the relationship so that the advice given is best suited to our requirements and appetite.”
“Exceeded massively.”
“Good team.”
“Errors in CT calculations.”
“Smooth and transparent process. We agreed to shorten this year’s timeline which went as planned.”
“Still too early in relationship.”
“Responsive, accounts signed ahead of time despite some complexities this year. “
“Quality of work good. Could be more proactive on comms for relevant legislation changes. “
“Prompt and professional audit.”
“As was communicated during our last audit, the outsourcing experiment with South Africa didn’t work. Whilst we were also slow on our side going through a deep restructure it did not help having less able and qualified people on the audit – response times were slow and proactiveness was lower. This was in contrast to prior year audit experiences.”