FRS 102: THE SMALL PRINT
FRED 82 brings some big changes, especially around revenue recognition and lease accounting. But it’s not just these areas, there are other important updates to FRS 102 that are worth highlighting too. Let’s take a look.
1 Reply:
UK GAAP’s changes to revenue recognition now align more closely with IFRS 15, introducing the five-step model. This update means many businesses will need to reassess how they account for revenue, especially for com
The latest update to Section 23 brings UK GAAP closer to IFRS 15, which means we’re now using the five-step revenue recognition model, with a few simplifications.
For most businesses, this means a reassessment of how revenue contracts are accounted for, especially when they’re more complex. Think bundles of goods and services, variable considerations, warranties, customer options, or significant financing components.
If you’re applying the updated Section 23 for the first time, you’ll also want to take another look at how you’re handling principal vs agent decisions, plus how and when revenue is recognised ‘over time.’
We’ve broken down the five steps for you below.
At first, the five-step model might seem pretty simple, but the real challenges often hide in the finer details. Join us for a virtual training webinar where we will dive into these nuances and explore them in more depth.
At the beginning of a contract, an entity should identify the performance obligations in the contract.
A performance obligation is a promise to transfer a distinct good or service, or a series of distinct goods or services.
A good or service is distinct if both of he following criteria are met:
The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled, excluding amounts collected on behalf of third parties.
Adjustments for time value of money are made for deferred or advanced payments.
The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation in proportion to the stand-alone selling prices of the goods/services underlying each performance obligation.
The stand-alone selling prices are based on observable prices or suitable estimation methods, such as an adjusted market assessment, expected cost plus margin, and a residual approach.
An entity should determine at contract inception whether a performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time.
If a performance obligation is not satisfied over time, an entity satisfies the performance obligation at a point in time.
The point in time for revenue recognition is determined by assessing when control of the asset passes to the customer. Control indicators in paragraph 23.85 may be considered in assessing when control passes to the customer.
The timing of revenue recognition might change, which could affect tax payments, available profits for distribution, and key performance indicators.
Here’s a quick look at the main disclosures required in your financial statements:
Performance Obligations: You’ll need to disclose the nature of these obligations, when they’re satisfied, and typical payment terms.
Over Time Recognition: If your revenue is recognized over time, you’ll need to explain the methods used.
Unfinished Business: Provide both quantitative and qualitative info about any unsatisfied performance obligations and when they’re expected to be fulfilled.
Contract Costs: You’ll also need to disclose balances, including any amortization or impairment losses.
Although the changes to FRS 102 won’t kick in until periods starting on or after 1 January 2026, it’s a good idea to start assessing their impact on your financial statements now.
Here are some practical tips to get ahead:
Review Your Sales Contracts: Take stock of the different types of sales contracts you have in place.
Revisit Customer Contracts: Understand how the new revenue standard could affect the terms of your current contracts.
Consider Future Contracts: Think about whether the upcoming changes to FRS 102 will require new contractual terms for future sales.
Understand the Impact on Key Metrics: The five-step model could affect tax payments, profits available for distribution, and key performance indicators in business agreements like lending covenants, earn-outs, and performance-related pay. The earlier you identify potential impacts, the more time you’ll have to take action and communicate effectively with stakeholders.
Starting this process now will help you stay ahead of the game and make sure everything is in place when the changes come into effect.
FRED 82 brings some big changes, especially around revenue recognition and lease accounting. But it’s not just these areas, there are other important updates to FRS 102 that are worth highlighting too. Let’s take a look.
Big changes are coming to financial reporting, and FRED 82 is leading the way. We get that compliance can feel like a headache, but getting ahead now will save you a world of hassle later.
Big changes are coming for lessees. The FRC’s latest update to FRS 102 brings lease accounting in line with international standards, meaning most leases will now need to be recognised on the balance sheet.
“Great communication.”
“Although the service we have received has been extremely good, there has been long delays in partner reviews.”
“Great relationship with Audit Partner and Audit Manager which means resolutions are reached quickly on difficult and complex issues. The accounts are put together in an efficient and well presented manner. The audit team generally adopt a logical and pragmatic approach. Only real negatives were that Kennedy audit was a more a drawn out process than perhaps it needed to be. Reconciling the consolidated accounts back to the Cooper Parry calcs was complex and there were some small discrepancies. As discussed with the Audit Partner I do have some concerns on the level of fees.”
“Great conference, helpful team and super service. Thank you.”
“The account were turned around quickly, and we were kept up to date with the progress of the audit”
“Easy communication, always get back to me promptly, provide advice when needed, like the Inflo system very user friendly.”
“The recent external audit and financial statement preparation were executed with professionalism and thoroughness. The auditor team demonstrated strong technical expertise and diligence, ensuring the process was both comprehensive and transparent. Their approach to testing, particularly in collaboration with the ASCL PD team during the first week, was highly effective and contributed to a smooth progression of the audit work, especially given its proximity to the annual conference. One area of improvement would be the timeline planning. The current schedule presents significant pressure in ensuring all necessary work is completed within tight deadlines. We have already discussed the potential benefits of moving some of the audit activities forward and setting clear dates in advance. Proactively scheduling key milestones would allow for better resource allocation and smoother execution. Another area of improvement would be the team working with their internal colleagues to check the partial VAT and advise on the changes to make for the next financial year. Additionally, the format and content of the audit findings report received positive feedback from elected officers. Its clarity and structure enabled effective review and discussion, reinforcing its value in financial oversight. Overall, the service provided was impressive, and the auditors’ commitment to delivering a high-quality review is appreciated. With a few refinements to planning and scheduling, the process could become even more efficient in future audits.”
“Great team, fit well into our office, professional approach whilst both friendly and very supportive. Pleasure to work with.”
“Communication was excellent and timely and the upload and action processes very smart and effective. Audit staff were friendly and helpful throughout the process.”
“Just very easy to deal with, all very relaxing to be honest!”